Campus ID News
Card, mobile credential, payment and security
FEATURED
PARTNERS
school lock door 1

Helping schools prioritize security options

CampusIDNews Staff   ||   Jul 24, 2015  ||   ,

A Tiered approach

PASS tackles the process of security from multiple angles, forming a tiered approach to implementation. The group’s recommendations follow the practice of implementing security in depth, laying out solutions for property perimeters, parking lots, building perimeters, classrooms, visitor control, video surveillance and emergency notification.

Within each layer of security the recommendations are divided into Tiers, progressing from Tier 1, which provides a good baseline level of security, to Tier 4 that includes the most aggressive measures for securing a facility.

The reality is that many schools won’t be able to implement Tier 4 measures, nor will many have the need to do so. The purpose of the Tiers is to provide school administrators with the necessary tools to gauge their risk level, security needs, and using their available resources, develop a security plan tailored to their school.

One of the primary authors of the K-12 guidelines is Jim Crumbley president and CEO of Risk Response Team and PASS vice chairman. He sees the tiered structure as a means to create a more personalized security assessment for schools. “As a consultant, it’s important to understand the culture of the organization as well as the risks that it faces, mitigate those risks and match a solution to the available funding and budget,” he explains.

Crumbley stresses that security systems must do more than cover liability alone. “Setting the bar higher than the organization is able to achieve is not doing anyone any favors,” he says.

Suggesting a comprehensive access control system for a school that may not be able to afford one isn’t an effective approach. Instead, Crumbley says that a school must look at what it can do today. From there, it can present facts to its school board to lay a framework for further improvements going forward. “It gives schools a phased option for securing a facility,” he says.

Crumbley often sees people emphasize the catastrophic events to gain traction for funding, but he says over time that traction can be lost. A better way would be to build a case study to show where a school actually stands on daily incidents – crime, violence in the area, car break-ins, vandalism, fights, drug or gang activity, and so on.

Crumbley warns against making emotional decisions based on active shooter scenarios. “Schools will install bulletproof glass at the front door but won’t have cameras installed yet,” he says. “There has to be a baseline system in place first.”

Crumbley explains that the tiered structure is designed to enable a school to move between the various levels over time as budgets allow for improvements or as needs change. “It’s vital to work with local authorities to determine a school’s risk and how to move up the tier continuum,” he says.

The tiers aren’t reserved for particular types of schools, rather the tiers are designed to be navigated over time. “While a Tier 4 could be difficult on the funding side, and higher Tiers may be difficult for a school to support, you could start out at a Tier 1 and upgrade to higher tiers over time,” Crumbley explains.

A helping hand

For K-12 schools, security measures will be subject to budgets, and unless a school has unlimited resources, difficult decisions regarding how best to secure a campus and its students must be made.

The guidelines identified in PASS’ document are not intended to provide solutions for every risk and every situation, nor will it make any product-specific recommendations. The document does, however, highlight the need for administrators and public safety officials to work together, using the guidelines as a basis to assess needs and develop a risk management strategy unique to each school.

“The optimal goal is to make this a code where a school can say ‘I want a Tier 1 system,’ and the guidelines would give them the proper recommendations for that,” explains St. Pierre. “We want to help schools identify what tier they want to be at and give them specifics to make that a reality.”

SIA and NCSA stress that the ideas and recommendations detailed in the PASS guide are meant to be “living.” That is, when new risks and new approaches are identified – technical or operational – PASS will update the Tiers and general recommendations accordingly.

Physical security and campus safety make up the primary concern for parents and educators alike. Despite the undeniable need for such measures on campus, however, the process of implementing proper safety and security is a daunting one.

By providing school administrators with the valuable insight they need to make educated decisions, the process can be a more manageable one. Additional information about PASS and the K-12 guidelines can be found at www.passk12.org.

Pages: 1 2

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

RECENT ARTICLES

Credentials 101 Series banner

Understanding chip options for contactless campus cards

Three main components underly modern credential technology – chips, formats, and encryption. Each are applicable to both cards and mobile credentials and understanding them is key to making informed decisions for your campus card program. In this series of articles, we will dive into each component, but first a brief preview. Chips are the core of […]
Apex OrderHQ Array modular lockers
Jul 02, 25 /

Modular locker solution streamlines campus order pickup

Apex Order Pickup Solutions launched a new modular system of automated order pickup lockers that can be stacked or setup in custom configurations. The OrderHQ Array Series lockers work in any floor plan without expensive remodeling. In an interview with Food On Demand, Kent Savage, founder and executive chairman of Apex Order Pickup Solutions, compares […]
Amy Surprenant, HID Global
Jun 26, 25 / ,

Effective project management key to GWU mobile credential launch

In a recent interview, HID Global’s Amy Surprenant discusses the project management component of the mobile credential launch at George Washington University (GWU). With 26,000 faculty, staff, and students, the project marked a significant milestone for the institution and its partners, including HID, CBORD, and various on-campus departments and vendors. The deployment of HID Mobile […]
CIDN logo reversed
The only publication dedicated to the use of campus cards, mobile credentials, identity and security technology in the education market. CampusIDNews – formerly CR80News – has served more than 6,500 subscribers for more than two decades.
Twitter

Attn: friends in the biometrics space. Nominations close Friday for the annual Women in Biometrics Awards. Take five minutes to recognize a colleague or even yourself. http://WomenInBiometrics.com

Feb. 1 webinar explores how mobile ordering enhanced campus life, increased sales at UVA and Central Washington @Grubhub @CBORD

Load More...
Contact
CampusIDNews is published by AVISIAN Publishing
315 E. Georgia St.
Tallahassee, FL 32301
www.AVISIAN.com[email protected]
Use our contact form to submit tips, corrections, or questions to our team.
©2025 CampusIDNews. All rights reserved.