Campus ID News
Card, mobile credential, payment and security
FEATURED
PARTNERS

The 8:30 am class might have been a mistake. But to keep from falling asleep in art history John Q. Student simply pulls out his smart phone, opens an app, places an order for the espresso with an extra shot, along with a bagel and cream cheese, and picks it up on his way to class with time to spare.

For more than 60 campuses across the U.S., this scenario is a reality thanks to Tapingo Inc., a provider of online and mobile food service solutions.

Instead of waiting in line for food, a student can open the app on their smart phone – iOS or Android – choose where they want to eat on campus and place an order. The app will then give them a ticket number and let them know how long it will be before the order is ready.

Tapingo enables campuses to outsource mobile and online food ordering on campus. Students can use the university’s declining balance accounts, payment cards or PayPal to make purchases with their mobile app or through a web site, says Ben Anderson, director of campus sales at Tapingo.

Tapingo runs the systems for the university and the merchants with 24/7 support. The company monitors all locations to stay ahead of potential issues. For example, if the printer is running out of paper or the device is unplugged, Tapingo notifies the venue to prevent any service disruptions, Anderson explains.

But each campus decides how the program is setup. For example, Tapingo has institutions across the country using its system but whether funds from a student account can be used with Tapingo at another campus is up to the student’s institution. Also, some universities don’t offer a declining balance account and Tapingo works with them to create an account or enable use of other payment types.

Tapingo also provides an off-campus component for its clients that already have a program in place. The system enables students to use their declining balance accounts to make purchases in the community.

For those colleges who have meal plan points instead of dollars Tapingo can offer meal exchanges or meal equivalencies at certain locations, at certain times or with certain limitations. Tapingo can enable those options directly through the application.

Tapingo offers different payment options for universities wanting to use it service. Instead of upfront costs and annual fees, most universities choose to have Tapingo take a small transaction fee on each order to offset launch expenses and ongoing support and marketing costs. If the program does well, the total cost to the campus will increase but the university also will see financial, operational and customer service benefits, Anderson says.

Beyond dining at University of Santa Clara

The University of California at Santa Clara started using the service in January 2012 and has taken it beyond food service, says Nirmal Palliyaguru, director of the ACCESS Card Office at Santa Clara University. All of the school’s dining services are hooked up to Tapingo as well as more than 20 off-campus merchants.

But Santa Clara has also enabled university clubs and student organizations to access Tapingo to accept payments for tickets, t-shirts and other events. The campus ministry, for example, used the service to accept payments for a retreat and reported $15,000 in sales, Palliyaguru says.

Students can hook up their campus card account to Tapingo as well as credit, debit and PayPal accounts.

Santa Clara has seen increases in the total spend per purchase thanks to Tapingo. Instead of having a barista ask if the customer wants an extra shot with the latte, the app asks the question instead. “With the app I am more likely to buy something with a higher dollar value,” Palliyaguru says.

After a soft launch in January 2012, Santa Clara did a full rollout for the following fall semester, informing incoming freshmen about the app and offering a coupon. Since then, word of mouth has been enough to educate students.

As expected, Santa Clara food service has had to adapt to the new option. Workflows had to change, but Santa Clara had some champions in the department who eased the transition, Palliyaguru says.

Santa Clara pays a fee to Tapingo to use the service. Whether the higher ticket order has offset that fee, Palliyaguru wouldn’t say. “The return we see in student satisfaction is far greater than the fee we pay Tapingo,” he says.

Northern Arizona takes meal plans mobile

Another early adopter of Tapingo was Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff. Tapingo is accepted at 20 on-campus dining options, including Einstein Bagels and some late night fare, as well as some off-campus locations, says TC Eberly, director of campus services and activities at the institution.

The app is popular on campus with 10,000 unique users out of the 19,000-student population, Eberly says. From January to mid-May there were 150,000 orders placed via the app.

As the app’s popularity has grown, so too has the need for students to know when their orders are going to be ready. Northern Arizona decided to use a feature of Tapingo called Active Cashier to keep track of orders and let students know when food will be ready for pickup, Eberly explains.

Active Cashier tracks when an order is entered and fulfilled and automatically provides the customer with the wait time for an order pickup. For example, if a student is leaving class at noon and places an order on his way to the cafeteria, the system will know that it’s a busy time of day and give the student an estimated pickup window based on that data. “We do our best to communicate with the customers and let them know that the order might not be ready as soon as they show up,” Eberly adds.

The university is also fine-tuning how meal plans are accepted via the app at some of its dining partners. The meal plans work on a virtual punch card basis, with students that sign up for the platinum plan receiving more punches per week.

This has caused some complexity when the plans are being consumed outside the campus-run dining halls. For example, the standard meal plan could be used at Einstein Brothers for a coffee and bagel with cream cheese, while the school’s platinum meal plan can be used to get the coffee as well as a breakfast sandwich and fruit cup, Eberly explains.

Northern Arizona has been working with Tapingo to have better integration of these disparate meal plans into the app. There is also a declining balance account that the university offers, and to add even more to the mix, students can also opt to use a credit or debit account as well.

The university tells students about the app during freshman orientation so they are ready to use it when they arrive on campus in the fall, Eberly says.

Northern Arizona was already looking at running a kind of online ordering system in house before it found Tapingo, Eberly says “The road blocks and complications for PCI compliance make it difficult for a school to run it in house,” he says.

Eberly hasn’t done a financial analysis of the cost of Tapingo versus what the service brings in, but he says student satisfaction trumps it all. He points out that today’s college freshmen were born in 1996 so they have the expectation of online ordering.

University of Southern California keeps it on campus

This fall will mark a full year since the University of Southern California rolled out Tapingo, says Kris Klinger, director at USC Hospitality. The university has 26 retailers on campus signed up to take orders, including California Pizza Kitchen, Starbucks and Coffee Bean.

USC has found that students upsell themselves when using the app, adding an extra side order or item when using the app, Klinger says. Overall locations where Tapingo is enabled have seen greater sales. “We have a Starbucks and a convenience store (that does not accept mobile ordering) and the store sales have dropped while Starbucks has increased,” he explains, adding that people like making purchases with the app.

Working with some of the big brands was a challenge at first, Starbucks and Coffee Bean in particular had to be convinced to accept orders from the app, but it has paid off, Klinger says.

USC students can use the university’s declining balance account to pay for purchases as well as other payment cards. The school hasn’t done a cost analysis on Tapingo yet, Klinger says. “My gut says it’s pretty close to breaking even,” he explains. “It’s driving transactions, increasing check total and the students expect this so it’s keeping them happy.”

Walk into virtually any computer lab or library on a college campus and you’re likely to see rows of print stations processing countless print jobs. Look a little closer and you’ll also find the blue recycling bins overflowing with wasted paper.

Printing is expensive, both in terms of dollars and resources. And on a college campus it’s incessant – a never-ending queue of term papers, exam reviews, class notes and sadly, misprints.

Studies suggest that the average college student produces 320 pounds of paper waste each year. This equates to more than 3,000 pages of wasted printer paper per student, and that figure doesn’t include the non-wasted pages that students print.

“Without any print cost recovery efforts universities are footing the bill for each and every student print job, translating to expenses that can reach hundreds of thousands of dollars,” says Julie Walker, global sales and marketing manager at PaperCut. “By taking some simple measures, university administrators can both limit unnecessary printing and encourage positive student behavior that equates to huge cost savings.”

The Higher Ed challenge

Implementing a print cost recovery solution at a university poses challenges that corporate implementations do not. As Walker explains, the logistical complexity of a university – with large distributed sites and multiple faculties – yields unique print requirements.

Technical complexity is a concern as well, as each faculty often has autonomy around IT and devices. “This means that any print cost recovery program must operate with a variety of operating platforms – Windows, Mac, Linux or Novell – and printing devices,” she says.

Likely because of this complexity, print cost recovery traditionally was approached in a lab-by-lab or department-by-department manner.

Universities have taken a localized approach when implementing print cost recovery, says Dale McIntyre, senior vice president of marketing at Pharos Systems. “Traditionally, it was easier to implement in a single department because that department had its own budget and IT staff,” he says.

But this is now changing. “University administrators are realizing that running disparate solutions on a single campus is not as cost effective,” says McIntyre. Institutions also want to give students a single print and copy experience across the entire campus. He says there is a new trend to approach these implementations holistically and institution-wide.

How it works

The typical first step in a print cost recovery effort is observation. A university has to first understand where it’s wasting resources, and to what degree, before it can effectively solve the problem.

Print cost solutions typically provide campuses with an analytical tool that can examine where the print waste is taking place, as well as provide metrics on nearly every imaginable aspect of a print job.

“We can differentiate between the type of document it is – PowerPoint, Word, Excel – distinguish based on URL, and assess different costs for each URL,” says Lisa Berta Dzafic, sales advisor at ITC Systems, a campus card provider and PaperCut dealer for the U.S. market. “We can also see what percentage of the page is color versus black and white – a process known as page-level color detection.”

Print control solutions also provide visibility into the volume of users accessing the system, where jobs originate from on campus and where the print ultimately occurs.

“Say, for example, you have a library with five floors and you have print stations on every floor. We can track the most popular areas,” says Dzafic. “Is anyone printing from the fifth floor, or are those workstations sitting idle? How many are printing education-related material and how many are printing from non-university websites. We can also track color ink usage, making it easier to determine how many color-printing stations are needed.”

Print cost recovery not only determines how many pages are being printed, but also user trends throughout the year. These systems can generate metrics to help a university establish rules and routines to cut costs, determine lab locations and extend or cut print lab hours, for example.

While these metrics are pivotal to every implementation, they are especially important for those universities with little to no experience with print cost recovery.

“We find that a lot of the universities that are new to the print cost recovery world don’t have a good handle on how much they’re spending on printing, how many reams of paper they’re going through, or how much toner they’re using,” explains Dzafic. “New institutions often set up PaperCut to run in silent mode so we can track and establish how much waste there really is.”

Pharos’ analytics solution, Beacon, is a cloud-based data visualization dashboard for what the company considers the three main vectors in any print solution: devices, users and documents. “Beacon displays enterprise wide what each disparate department is printing,” explains McIntyre. “This means that print cost recovery doesn’t fall to each department head, rather the university can take a high-level, data-based and analytical approach to controlling waste.”

The fairest tax?

Print waste can typically be dealt with in one of two ways, according to Steve Haber, president of GoPrint Systems. “First, cost recovery occurs by eliminating wasteful or ‘mistake’ prints which are discarded. These are often misprints or multiple prints of the same page when only one was actually needed,” says Haber. “Fewer pages printed and wasted represent an immediate cost savings.”

Haber next prescribes charging for print jobs, stressing users must pay to print at any off-campus location so why not on campus. “If a university charges $0.10 per page, they can cover cost of products, supplies and maintenance on all equipment,” he says.

It becomes a bridge toll. “It’s the fairest tax of all because it doesn’t penalize everyone, only those who use it,” Haber says.

But students are likely to view it as anything but fair. “Students always feel they are overtaxed and that everything should be included in tuition, so setting expectations is essential,” Haber explains. “Stress that the ‘bridge toll’ only affects users, and that it puts funds collected back into the products they use to keep them fresh and functional.”

Realistic expectations

It’s important that a university have an understanding of how a print cost recovery effort will realistically affect the bottom line. The software alone is far from a magic-bullet solution.

All of the vendors who provided comment for this story said that a university should expect drops in printing of anywhere from 30% to 50% after it is initially deployed.

“Implementing a print cost recovery program is automatically going to reduce the amount of paper coming out of your printers whether you’re charging for each sheet or not,” says ITC’s Dzafic. This is because the solutions end anonymous printing and introduce accountability.

In terms of cost savings, PaperCut’s Walker agrees, saying that a university should expect to see a measured return on investment by saving immediately on paper and toner alone.

Next there is income generation associated with pay-per-print that will both deter unnecessary printing and provide revenue. Additionally, Walker highlights an increased flexibility in printing solutions that enables students to send print jobs to one print queue and release it at any printer across campus.

Institutions can also monitor volumes at each location and can load balance printing across departments and campuses to optimize capital equipment expenses. “To achieve the largest savings, the institution must be conscious of the device utilization and actively manage their distribution and retirement,” says McIntyre.

The role of campus card

The campus card is a pivotal piece of every college student’s daily life, and the university can leverage this credential as part of a print cost recovery effort as well. “It should be a requirement for universities to integrate any print cost recovery solution into the existing Active Directory databases and student ID systems,” says PaperCut’s Walker. “Any way to simplify the student experience as they print will be key to adoption of a new system across the campus.”

The campus card system has always been a prime mechanism for the secure release and payment for any student print job related to their role as a student or perhaps their role as a research assistant on a grant, McIntyre explains. “Authenticated users and the installation of a release station where students use a card, usually results in significant saving for universities that embrace the system – 30% or more just by installing a secure release station,” says McIntyre.

The campus card is essential to secure release printing, and few would argue that the experience of a card transaction is far superior to typing in your credentials manually. “The student ID simplifies the experience and is essential because it’s tied to that student’s identity,” says McIntyre. “When you go to the secure release print queue, instead of seeing everybody’s print job, you only see yours.”

A mobile future

Print cost recovery will have a place on campus so long as its students, faculty and staff require paper to conduct daily business. But the future hinges on the role of mobile devices.

“Today, with wireless, mobile and network printing, universities are asking for increased control for students who are sending jobs to disparate print stations,” says ITC’s Dzafic. Wireless and handheld devices are becoming more prevalent in campus printing, accompanied by a shrinking number of traditional workstations.

Mobile device printing poses problems that don’t exist with workstations, and there are some campuses that are cautious about this area due to security and privacy concerns, says GoPrint’s Haber.

“There are just too many variables involved to imagine that everything created can be sent to a single funnel where it is converted to another format and then printed to perfection,” Haber says. “Students want it and most suppliers provide this service, but it cannot be a complete substitute for driver-based printing.”

But wireless printing remains an option, nonetheless. As Pharos’ McIntyre recalls, Dartmouth made the decision to support wireless printing, and did so with relative ease. “Dartmouth opted to implement mobile print in the middle of the semester and the middle of the week while students were in class, and the installation took only two hours,” says McIntyre. “All we had to do at the end of two hours was restart print services and the solution was up and running without any glitches.”

Green is a state of mind

Ultimately, for print cost recovery to be successful, it must be accompanied by a change of mindset. In the university space, any additional charge to the student is met with torches and pitchforks, so it is vital that a university educates students on the importance of print cost recovery.

“A university really just wants to police the abusers,” says ITC’s Dzafic. “Everybody is moving toward a greener lifestyle; teachers are already opting to post their materials on a web portal rather than printing them.”

The first objection we hear is always “my students can’t afford it,” or parents will raise concerns because they already pay so much for tuition, explains Dzafic. “Nobody realizes how much money is being invested in paper and toner for wasted printing,” she says.

McIntyre is reminded of a common phrase at Pharos: Devices don’t print; people do. “Behavior change is the primary challenge that a technology solution alone can’t solve,” he says. “Successful organizations eliminate non-essential printing or prevent printing abuse by helping users be more mindful of the ramifications of their choice to print.”

It’s a concept that applies to higher education and private corporations alike.

“For one of our corporate customers, Coca-Cola, we explained that it takes 12 ounces of clean water – not muddy river water, but clean, drinkable water – to produce just one sheet of paper in the manufacturing process,” says McIntyre. “Then we put those posters near the printers in the middle of August when Atlanta was in a drought an under water rations. It hits people right at the heart of things.”

How, then, should a university present this vital information to students? McIntyre suggests that it’s a matter of incentive.

“Print cost recovery carries a negative incentive in that I have to pay for every job. It makes me aware of my wallet, but not the bigger picture,” explains McIntyre. “Once you start teaching and engaging hearts as well as minds, behavior management becomes one of positive incentive.”

Going green, saving green

Universities face a common challenge when it comes to printing. Managing disparate labs, libraries and print stations as well as the thousands of users that interact with them can be a costly nightmare.

There are solutions available, however, that can provide a comprehensive view of where waste occurs and help to eliminate it. Still there’s far more to implementing an effective cost recovery solution than simply installing software.

Instilling a sense of awareness and accountability in students can go a long way toward a greener, less expensive and more responsible campus print system.

Whether to pre-print static areas of the institution’s cardstock or rely on desktop printers to add all the elements on the fly is an important and debatable topic. There are tangible benefits – both in terms of the cards themselves and the process of issuing them – for a university that pre-prints its cardstock. But there are also drawbacks related to flexibility and timeliness.

ColorID’s higher education and K-12 market manager, Tim Nyblom, spoke with CR80News about when pre-printing card stock is appropriate, why a university should consider it, and most importantly, how they should do it.

Why pre-print?

“Pre-printing is for universities that want a professional-grade cardstock and recognize that cost is not the primary concern,” says Nyblom. “It creates a longer lasting card with superior color quality and provides a more robust final product than a standard desktop printer can yield.”

Professional aesthetics and longer lifespans aren’t the only benefits, however. As Nyblom explains, pre-printing enables a university to expedite the issuance process, as there is less area for the printer to cover, allowing the ID card to be completed quicker.

“Pre-printed cardstock using lithographic or digital presses is made via layers and the artwork layer is protected by a thick clear sheet of laminate,” explains Nyblom. “Desktop ID printers print on the outside layer of a manufactured card and thus is prone to fading over time.”

Pre-printed cards offer a noticeably better print quality that cannot be matched using a desktop ID printer.

“Pre-printed cardstock gives you 3,000 DPI (Dots per square inch), whereas desktop ID printers can only reach 600 DPI,” he explains. “It also allows a university to utilize the Pantone Matching System to recreate their brand’s specific colors.”

More than one way to pre-print

Deciding whether or not to pre-print is just the first step. Next is choosing the printing method and whether to do the work in house or outsource to a third-party vendor.

As Nyblom explains, there are three pre-printing methods that a university can choose from: lithographic printing, high definition/digital press printing, and dye sublimation.

“In house pre-printing is usually done with a high issuance desktop ID printer utilizing the dye sublimation method,” explains Nyblom. “This method is good when low quantities, single-sided printing or monochrome (one color) printing is needed.”

Nyblom stresses that the in-house method using a desktop dye sublimation printer is not to be confused with outsourcing via lithographic or digital press printing. “Once a card has passed through a desktop ID printer, you don’t want to print on that same side again as the print head and ribbon can stick to the already printed cardstock,” he says.

In the campus card market where card fronts are almost always personalized to the individual, in-house dye sublimation pre-printing is typically only considered for static card backs as a time saving measure.

This is not the case, however, with other printing methods. “Having your static design pre-printed via a lithographic or digital press first and then printing your variable information with your desktop ID printer is the best route to take,” says Nyblom. Variable information often includes elements such as cardholder photo, name, ID number and barcode.

Nyblom explains that lithographic printing is ideal for large quantity runs of 5,000 cards or more. The printing is of an extremely high quality, offering a 3,000 DPI resolution, and has the ability to print a large number of colors, including specific spot colors – often referred to as PMS or Pantone colors.

“In this process, the cards are manufactured from large plastic sheets consisting of 28, 56 or 70 cards per sheet that are then cut down into individual cards,” explains Nyblom. “The cards are built up through different layers of materials including clear plastic, PVC and PET.”

Another avenue is High Definition printing, otherwise known as Digital Press printing. This method is ideal for low to mid-level quantities from 500 up to 10,000 cards, while still offering up to 3,000 DPI print resolution.

The main difference from Lithographic, as Nyblom explains, is that digital press plastic sheets typically consist of only 21 cards per sheet. “Universities that opt for digital press can still utilize multiple colors for their cards and incorporate Pantone colors for their unique and custom branding,” he adds.

While the other methods mass produce printed cardstock, dye sublimation printing is done one card at a time on pre-assembled ID cardstock, and is generally used for low-volume printing. “The dye sublimation process will apply color to the cardstock one color at a time: yellow, magenta, cyan and then black,” says Nyblom. “Since this process only uses a four color process, it is not able to match PMS (Pantone) colors. It’s a process that is excellent for quick turn projects, low quantities and variable printing jobs.”

The case against pre-printing

Still, pre-printing cardstock may not always be the answer. “If a school is just launching their ID card program, I’d suggest starting off with utilizing a blank cardstock first,” Nyblom says. “This will allow them to adjust and change their card design to what works for them. After the university gains more experience and has identified what matters to them, then I would suggest migrating to a pre-printed cardstock.”

Traditionally, the arguments against pre-printing highlighted the lack of flexibility it carries. Once a large quantity of cards is ordered and printed, changes to card design are not possible. If these changes are mandated any remaining inventory must be discarded.

Additionally, inventory management becomes more crucial. If cards run out during the middle of an orientation session, it can cripple the issuance process and take weeks to replenish supplies.

Finally, for small quantity issuers pre-printing may not be cost effective despite its benefits.

Final thoughts

Pre-printing is a great way for a university to expedite its card issuance, while also boosting the overall quality of its campus IDs. By understanding the pre-printing options that are available and the institution’s specific requirements, pre-printing can offer a significant value add to campus card services.

A new initiative at Marquette University is giving every freshman and sophomore student living in a university residence hall a reusable takeout container to be used at the university’s dining halls.

The container is called an OZZI and is a 9-by-9 inch plastic container that’s both microwaveable and BPA-free. Provided the initiative goes as planned, the OZZI will replace the estimated tens of thousands of disposable takeout containers that have long filled garbage cans in the campus’ dining halls.

As reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, black metal boxes located at the dining halls will collect and store the used OZZI containers 24 hours a day, seven days a week, holding them until they are collected to be washed, sanitized and air dried before their next use. When a student deposits a dirty OZZI in the machine, it spits out a token that students can take then to a dining hall for a replacement OZZI when they order takeout.

Each collection machine holds roughly 250 dirty containers. The machine stacks and stores the containers, and automatically sends a text message to the food service manager on duty when it’s 75% full, alerting the employee that the containers should be removed from the machine and washed.

As an added touch, the machines will tally the collection statistics at the end of each month and calculate – based on bar code scans of containers – how many trees were saved.

To jump-start the project, Sodexo Dining Services provided about 4,000 free OZZI containers to students in residence halls when at move in, along with free reusable coffee mugs. Each OZZI can be used anywhere from 300 to 350 times, according to Kevin Gilligan, general manager of Sodexo Dining Services at Marquette.

To put that into perspective, the Marquette Place food court at Alumni Memorial Union – the largest dining venue at Marquette – estimates that roughly 75,000 takeout containers were being thrown out each semester prior to adopting OZZI.

A number of students were also eating out of disposable takeout containers, rather than china, Gilligan says. Student would then routinely toss the disposable containers in the trash and not in a recycling bin.

The Marquette University Student Government spent a total of $45,000 on the initative, which includes two OZZI collection machines, containers, tokens and a year’s worth of maintenance. In the time since, a third collection machine has been installed at another of Marquette’s dining halls.

To date, more than 80 universities nationwide have adopted the OZZI containers. Marquette’s Gilligan explains that he and several Sodexo partners first saw the OZZI at Pepperdine University, where the results were very positive.

The solution is off to a promising start at Marquette, but there are still a few growing pains.

Marquette’s Student Government president hopes that starting next year, students will get credit for a new OZZI directly added to their student ID accounts, rather than having to carry around tokens.

The location of the collection containers is another area of concern, as students eat takeout food in their rooms. They then have to take the dirty container back to a machine in a dining hall to get a token.

While a damaged OZZI is replaced for free, if a student chooses to toss the container in the trash, they have to pay $5 for a replacement in the dining hall.

Rutgers University has approved a new student preferred name policy that will enable students to use preferred names instead of legal names on official class rosters, the university’s learning resource management system Sakai and the Rutgers Electronic Grading and Information System.

The new name policy is an attempt to better accommodate international, transgender, gender-nonconforming and LGBT students. Previously, students wishing to be addressed by an alternative name had to email professors in advance, but Zaneta Rago, acting director of the Center for Social Justice Education and LGBT Communities at Rutgers, says the new policy will eliminate that process

In a report from The Daily Targum, Rago says the old procedure took nearly two years due to the technicalities associated with a name change. For this reason, a preferred name policy has been in the works for some time now.

“LGBT students and staff have been talking about the possibility of a preferred name policy for two years now, and ultimately with the creation of a new student group, the Trans*missions – the first trans and gender-nonconforming and ally student group on campus – in conjunction with RUSA, put together a preferred name bill last year,” says Rago.

Rago says that university administrators met the policy with open arms, though the technicalities and logistics of changing a student’s name was time consuming nonetheless.

The Center for Social Justice Education and LGBT Communities worked with Rutgers’ division of Student Affairs, the Registrar’s Office and the Office of Information Technology to institute the new preferred name policy.

According to Rago, since the policy became operational, about 65 students have signed forms to utilize the preferred name policy. The second phase of the policy, which is in progress, will enable students to use preferred names for student ID cards as well as housing rosters.

CIDN logo reversed
The only publication dedicated to the use of campus cards, mobile credentials, identity and security technology in the education market. CampusIDNews – formerly CR80News – has served more than 6,500 subscribers for more than two decades.
Twitter

Feb. 1 webinar explores how mobile ordering enhanced campus life, increased sales at UVA and Central Washington @Grubhub @CBORD

Join Jeff Koziol and Robert Gaulden from @AllegionUS as we explore how mobile credentials and proptech are changing on- and off-campus housing.

Load More...
Contact
CampusIDNews is published by AVISIAN Publishing
315 E. Georgia St.
Tallahassee, FL 32301
www.AVISIAN.com[email protected]
Use our contact form to submit tips, corrections, or questions to our team.
©2024 CampusIDNews. All rights reserved.